be and MBT Sport Men's Shoes

uuboot95

China: China does not have freedom of information. Without. We think individual freedom and freedom of information have conjunction. Why do you worry about freedom of information? 　　　　
　　
: Be in the United States, a beautiful little girl died, media was done cover in great quantities and guess, make the parental incur of this girl tremendous with additional mental anguish. Who be is anguish made make he earns its money greatly in order to satisfy another some of person's abnormal psychology before law adjudicates to media influence? Be " freedom of information " .
　　
The United States has the talk show compere of a long big chin, in Chinese women football and match of American women football before today in the program, did on the picture that gives hotel in pace of Chinese women football a few wear write on black clothes " pubic hair " the person of two words. The power that who gave this fellow informal affront others be? Be " freedom of information " . 　　　　
　　
American media takes away Cuba in report police the photograph that a piece of police published to pointing to the boy with the gun when boy dust is connected, but occupy spot eyewitness to say,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] ,, the gun did not point to the boy at all, as a result of,be shooting angle, make the photograph produced this kind of result, the result produced a disturbance. The power that who gave media this kind of subreption be? Be " freedom of information " . Western media gossip, insist stubbornly Kosovo produced phyletic massacre, cite the aggression that sends north to make an appointment with army. North of after the event makes an appointment with army to be searched everywhere, ability discovery does not have what massacre at all, the body that dies all sorts of reasons adds in the person that also makes an appointment with legionary bomb to kill without north is much. Be who gave media power of bloodguilty of this kind of start a rumour? Be " freedom of information " . 　　　　
" freedom of information " it is journalism nevertheless to make he does not accept any restriction the ground grabs profit and make a totem that come out, only this just. Just the special power that journalism uses him to be able to control people thinking is acclaimed ceaselessly, just turned the fairy tale that said 1000 times into the truth. 　　　　
20 centuries before 30 time, " trade is free " and " freedom of information " also be a kind of totem euqally, from Adam? The hand that Si Mi says to lose sight of can square after everything, commercial freedom became the principle with inviolable stern. Successors discover, free competition can be brought send conspire and forestall, can violate consumer interest, must try to restrict to commercial freedom. Be in the United States this most the country that advocates liberal economy, one pile held water to superintend commercial branch in the government, gross has 100 thousand person. Established all sorts of organizations that protect consumer interest socially. In fact, the United States is economy superintends the strictest, best country, to this we are very admiring. We are learning superintendency system of the United States to transform our government sector. News, media also is an enterprise, they are not blame gain organization, it is the commercial company of the purpose with gain however. News is the product that these enterprises make, they think with news this product goes ** , they have sufficient motive to do empty to do false, shoddy, string seek conspire, gainful. By what news need not the quality of this product suffer superintend,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] ,, do not get control? Same existence is not between news quality and news consumer is an information asymmetrical problem? Look, this American advanced country has not thought up superintendency news the tweak of this kind of product comes, it is like you before 30 time free to commerce in that way, since such, what do we have necessary go borroweding in a hurry you? After still waiting for you to create a better experience, we learn again. 　　　　
　　
As to individual freedom, the absolute freedom of anybody is the limitation to others. American south has a plant, white worker is drawing the banner of southern federal on board, the worker that be not descendants puts forward to protest to the manufacturer,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] ,, the manufacturer agrees not to let these cars take factory door, the free speech that white worker protests them again gets enroach on. Pour a heart who should have the power of free speech? Both sides has can produce conflict, one party has, other one party can be restricted. 　　　
A person burned American national flag, local court should sue him, the supreme court thinks this individual is innocent, because he has the power of free speech. And a few assemblyman of United States Congress did not work, they want legislation to make this individual guilty. what who says the end is right? 　　　　
So-called free speech, it is difficult problem of a theory of games substantially, without correct solution,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] ,, want to restrict it with the democratic centralism so. Democracy is most principle, it is the freedom that limits a small number of people with the freedom of most person. Concentration is by majority the person's delegate comes exercise majority influence, the small number of people that is most philtrum substantially limits the freedom of most person. individual freedom must be restricted, because still be put in an efficiency principle,be. 　　　　
　　
It is so in a society, efficiency and justice cannot do one thing and neglect another, when efficiency and fair balance are touched, must execute efficiency first principle, this is historical logic,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] ,, perhaps call historical paradox. Look Mr Hualaishi not quite know the history and philosophy, I did not say more. 　　　　
　　
The Chinese Communist defeats the Kuomintang that has support of interest of powerful foreign country, because people supports us,be, majority of that is to say chose us. So we are in office have democratic base. On the other hand, as a result of American interpose, china still is in disrupt state, civil war state, national politics of China still cannot enter the normal of modern country to move. Once China is finished,unite, end civil war, chinese democracy with respect to can be expected soon. So, it is American block up and the democracy that disturbed China and freedom, and force accusation on our head. 　　　　
I am opposite the word that says to Clinton's president again you say to American public through you: Still unite to us please gain democracy and freedom in order to let us at an early date. powered by:[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
see more Information：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]